Skip to main content


As an urban economist and social scientist, I'm using this blog to post and share articles, my writings and other research that pertains to local economic development in the United States, Latin America and around the world.  In general, I am looking to find new financial mechanisms for the developing world. In that context, I evaluate government structures, municipal debt, taxes and other public finances. In particular, I study how governments fund their public programs. 

My  recent publications have appeared in World Development, Governance, International Review of Administrative Sciences (IRAS), Latin American Research Review, Public Administration Review, and Public Budgeting and Finance. Dr. Smith has taught public policy classes at Washington DC (George Mason University), Miami (Florida International University) and Mexico City (Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México and the Iberoamericana University).

My PhD in Public Administration from Florida International University focused on the local finances in Latin America.  Under the direction of Allan Rosenbaum, Meredith Newman, Keith Revell, David Bray and Andrew Selee of the Woodrow Wilson Center in Washington, DC,  my dissertation addressed the link between fiscal autonomy and economic development from a comparative perspective between Mexico and Argentine municipalities.  I was a recipient of a Fulbright-García Robles fellowship in Mexico. Previously, I earned my Masters in Public Policy from American University in Washington, DC and a BA in Political Science, Spanish and Latin American Studies from the University of Wisconsin (Madison). 

Before my doctoral studies, I served as an economic policy advisor for Western Hemisphere affairs for Secretary Clinton at the US Department of State and as public affairs specialist at the Inter-American Foundation, a small independent government agency which provides grants to community based initiatives in Latin America.  I have traveled to nearly every country in the region. 

Currently in Mexico, I study the municipal bond market and serve as a consultant and professor.  I've worked for  several international organizations (OECD, IDB, OAS, World Bank) on issues of fiscal federalism, auditing systems, taxes, municipal and state debt, state own enterprises and other areas of fiscal policy. Here is more info:

Topics covered in this blog include fiscal policy, financial regulation, decentralization, climate change, urbanization and economic development.  You will also find detailed information about the cities that I have lived: Washington DC, Mexico City, Buenos Aries and Miami. In particular, I focus on how the cities have promoted economic development and other public policies to strengthen their local economies. Posts are in Spanish and English.

Also, I have occasionally also included collections of songs, poems and whatnots to personalize this site. My father is a photographer and has trained me, so I've added a few of my photos here and there so you don't get bored with the academic writing. All is mine here excepted where otherwise cited. Enjoy and please, provide comments!

Heidi Jane Smith

Updated 2/16

Popular posts from this blog

New City Database

Stephen Goldsmith, a former mayor of Indianapolis, has launched a new
website to catalyze local government efforts to deploy data, analytics, and
civic engagement technologies that transform the way government operates.
The "Data-Smart City Solutions<>"
site and the broader campaign are housed at the Ash Center for Democratic
Governance and Innovation at the Harvard Kennedy School, the preeminent
voice for innovation in government.

The initiative is designed to offer city leaders a national depository of
working analytics methodologies and to connect leading industry, academic,
and government officials in the field.

Data-Smart City Solutions<>
will report fresh advances in the big data phenomenon, profiling big data
technology and municipal pioneers, and will present case histories …

The political/administrative dichotomy

Discuss in some detail the major theoretical perspectives listed below. In this discussion, first, identify the position of these perspectives towards the politics/administration dichotomy. Second, highlight the most important empirical propositions stemming from these theories and whether the research in the field supports these propositions.1.1. Political Control of Bureaucracy1.2. Representative Bureaucracy The study of the bureaucracy is at the heart of public administration, given that it is the organism that executes the policies created by the politicians. Theories of Political Control of Bureaucracy and Representative Bureaucracy originate from the foundational writings in the field—namely Wilson’s (1887) dichotomy of administration from politics and Waldo’s (1947) rebuttal statement that “Administration is politics.” Particularly these theories stem from how much influence politics has on the bureaucracy in the policy-making process. This essay will first provide the epistemol…

Muddling Through

In his seminal work, The Science of “Muddling Through” Charles E. Lindblom (1959) uses a systems approach to policy formation and suggests that a comparative approach could assist political scientist and policymakers to understand how decision-making happens. In his rebuttal to rational, scientific or mechanical processes, like cost-benefit analysis (CBA), Linblom suggests am incremental approach to understand decision-making. He attempts to describe how decisions are made through various methods of analysis including: the root vs. branch, evaluation and empirical analysis, ends vs. means, testing on hypotheses, non-comprehensive analysis of relevance vs. realism, but concludes that the small succession of events, incremental analysis often helps determine policies. Finally, he adds that while theorist search for the root of the problem and provide possible policy recommendations; practitioners need practical advice immediately on the job and may already be on a new topic when the a…