Capital Investment Planning


I.                    Capital investments

1.      Means fixed  big ticket items/ How big is big? Big ticket items are long lived. Concurrency build infrastructure before
2.      Possible construction management/quality of life/ Capital investments in south Florida important for growth
3.      Build new think of operating budget
4.      Possible tie in with property tax and usage fee (toll/tuition/streets)
5.      Economic development and infrastructure development—status and correction centers
Debt questions to this with affordability
6.      States/cities have bond rates there maybe serious needs
7.      Look at political legacy

II.                 Raw Politics vs. Rational Analysis

Raw Politics
Legally mandates/emergencies
Rational analysis
  • political legacy models
  • interstates/monuments
  • perceived LED
  • availability of funding from outside sources

Federal mandates like judicial deregulation
Unfunded programs like schooling/EPA
Economic rational but policy rational
Demographics
Community vision
Current trends/Harding of infrastructure action
Funding infrastructure (FIN)

Crisis with aviation with lack of infrastructure to meet demand
US greatest public transit system with people not willing to pay great user fees

III.              Capital budgeting

Typically 5 years stated from FY08 adopt new law/finish in FY2012 at years with rational and political years

State and local have separate capital budget to buy for use
US federal government do not separate items. What the Feds do for operating purpose looks for operating impact quicker to make sure they are able to fly and run so all maintenance is included within cost

Promotion of human development with different class:
1.      health care
2.      education
Feel that Human develpment should be separate than infrastucture investments
Sate have bond ratings and appropriations for separate items for Toll/turnpike so they are sustaining

IV.              CBA vs. cost effectiveness
This is the GO-no-GO decision vs. the select most effective approach
Discounting costs overtime should be “fee” driven and should do cost benefit analysis (CBA)

  1. lumpy decision making
  2. running the numbers—survey’s learn return on investment
  3. discounted cash flow-time value of $$
  4. make decision now or later
project A vs. project b—always selected the one which pays most money upfront because your money looses value over time

Project A
1,000,000
25000
25000
25000
25000
Project B
1000,000
33300
33300
33300
33300
Project B is better when you pay more money upfront

Discounted cash flow
Just looking at discounted cash flow analysis always pick the one where you spend more $ upfront you will get back more later in the future

100/(1.08)10=$50

so in 2008 it will costs 1.5 billion
yet in 2020 it will cost much less….

*$100 at 8% haw much will be the 100 in 10 years? Money is worth less in the future

Time value of money
Argued government use to lower than market interest rates to justify their capital improvement plans. Instead of a 1-5 scale how doe it impact
1.      health and human safety
2.      economic development
3.      atheistic quality of life
4.      future lost savings

Especially needed with small project that doesn’t generate income
How to value items?
Payback analysis

Popular Posts