Skip to main content

Metropolitan Cooperation and Administration in Mexico

The Role of Metropolitan Cooperation and Administrative Capacity in Subnational Debt Dynamics: Evidence From Municipal Mexico

Authors

Heidi Jane M. Smith, Allyson Lucinda Benton

First published: Full publication historyDOI: 10.1111/pbaf.12155View/save citationCited by: 0 articles
  • Heidi Jane M. Smith (corresponding author) is at the Departamento de Economía [Economics Department], Universidad Iberoamericana, Prolongación Paseo de Reforma 880, Lomas de Santa Fe, México, 01219, Ciudad de México. She can be reached at heidi.smith@ibero.mx.
  • Allyson Lucinda Benton is at the División de Estudios Políticos [Political Studies Department], Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas, AC (CIDE), Carretera México-Toluca 3655, Colonia Lomas de Santa Fé México, Ciudad de México 01210. She can be reached at allyson.benton@cide.edu.

Abstract

Research on subnational capital markets in developing nations has tended to focus on designing regulatory frameworks that compensate for structural economic, fiscal, and political factors. However, research on public investment in the United States shows that functional factors, like administrative capacity and metropolitan cooperation, are also important. Using a panel dataset of Mexican municipal debt (2005–2012), the study examines whether metropolitan cooperation and administrative capacity affect subnational debt decisions in this developing nation. Cross-sectional time-series analysis of different types of municipal debt (public development bank loans, private commercial bank debt, bond emissions, and trust instruments) reveals that municipalities in metropolitan areas avoid costlier credits but that they do not cooperate to access cheaper loans. The research reveals that administrative capacity plays little to no role in municipal debt decisions.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

New City Database

Stephen Goldsmith, a former mayor of Indianapolis, has launched a new
website to catalyze local government efforts to deploy data, analytics, and
civic engagement technologies that transform the way government operates.
The "Data-Smart City Solutions<
http://www.innovations.harvard.edu/redir.html?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdatasmart.ash.harvard.edu%2F>"
site and the broader campaign are housed at the Ash Center for Democratic
Governance and Innovation at the Harvard Kennedy School, the preeminent
voice for innovation in government.

The initiative is designed to offer city leaders a national depository of
working analytics methodologies and to connect leading industry, academic,
and government officials in the field.

Data-Smart City Solutions<
http://www.innovations.harvard.edu/redir.html?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdatasmart.ash.harvard.edu%2F>
will report fresh advances in the big data phenomenon, profiling big data
technology and municipal pioneers, and will present case histories …

The political/administrative dichotomy

Discuss in some detail the major theoretical perspectives listed below. In this discussion, first, identify the position of these perspectives towards the politics/administration dichotomy. Second, highlight the most important empirical propositions stemming from these theories and whether the research in the field supports these propositions.1.1. Political Control of Bureaucracy1.2. Representative Bureaucracy The study of the bureaucracy is at the heart of public administration, given that it is the organism that executes the policies created by the politicians. Theories of Political Control of Bureaucracy and Representative Bureaucracy originate from the foundational writings in the field—namely Wilson’s (1887) dichotomy of administration from politics and Waldo’s (1947) rebuttal statement that “Administration is politics.” Particularly these theories stem from how much influence politics has on the bureaucracy in the policy-making process. This essay will first provide the epistemol…

Muddling Through

In his seminal work, The Science of “Muddling Through” Charles E. Lindblom (1959) uses a systems approach to policy formation and suggests that a comparative approach could assist political scientist and policymakers to understand how decision-making happens. In his rebuttal to rational, scientific or mechanical processes, like cost-benefit analysis (CBA), Linblom suggests am incremental approach to understand decision-making. He attempts to describe how decisions are made through various methods of analysis including: the root vs. branch, evaluation and empirical analysis, ends vs. means, testing on hypotheses, non-comprehensive analysis of relevance vs. realism, but concludes that the small succession of events, incremental analysis often helps determine policies. Finally, he adds that while theorist search for the root of the problem and provide possible policy recommendations; practitioners need practical advice immediately on the job and may already be on a new topic when the a…